Larecoin Vs NOWPayments Vs CoinPayments: Which Web3 Payment Solution Actually Meets US Compliance Standards?
- [[[Free!!]<<<<]] Watch: 스포르팅 - 토트넘 Live Stream 13 September 2022
- 2 hours ago
- 4 min read
The Compliance Gap Nobody Talks About
Most crypto payment processors ignore the elephant in the room.
US regulatory compliance.
You're running a legitimate business. You need a payment solution that won't land you in hot water with FinCEN or state regulators. Yet most Web3 payment platforms operate in a gray zone: registered overseas, unclear compliance status, zero transparency about licensing.
That's a problem.

Why US Compliance Actually Matters For Your Business
Skip compliance. Face consequences.
Here's what's at stake:
FinCEN Scrutiny - Operating without proper Money Services Business (MSB) registration puts you on the radar
State Enforcement - Money Transmitter Licenses (MTL) aren't optional in most states
Bank Account Closures - Financial institutions terminate relationships with non-compliant processors
Customer Trust - B2B clients demand regulatory clarity before integration
Legal Liability - Using non-compliant processors exposes your business to regulatory risk
Most crypto payment solutions built their infrastructure offshore for a reason. Lower costs. Lighter regulation. Maximum flexibility.
But that creates maximum risk for US merchants.
Larecoin's US Compliance Strategy: MSB + State MTL Licensing
Larecoin takes a different approach.
Full US regulatory compliance from day one.
MSB Registration Strategy
Larecoin operates under a comprehensive Money Services Business registration framework with FinCEN. That means:
Complete AML/KYC protocols
Transaction monitoring systems
SAR filing capabilities
Customer identification programs
Risk-based compliance frameworks
No shortcuts. No gray zones.
State Money Transmitter License Roadmap
Here's where it gets serious. Larecoin pursues state-level MTL licensing across key jurisdictions. That includes:
New York (BitLicense framework consideration)
California (DFI registration)
Texas (MTL compliance)
Florida (Money transmitter requirements)
Illinois (TOMA licensing)
This isn't cheap. State licensing costs six figures minimum. But it protects merchants. It protects the ecosystem. It ensures longevity.

NOWPayments: The Offshore Compliance Question
NOWPayments operates from the Netherlands.
That's great for European merchants. Less ideal for US businesses.
Compliance Gaps:
No visible US MSB registration transparency
Unclear state MTL licensing status
Limited public compliance documentation
Offshore operational structure
Minimal regulatory framework disclosure
Does that mean NOWPayments violates US law? Not necessarily. But it creates uncertainty. And uncertainty equals risk for merchants processing significant volume.
The Real Issue:
When regulators come knocking, offshore processors often terminate US merchant accounts. No warning. No recourse. Your payment infrastructure disappears overnight.
Larecoin builds infrastructure that stays compliant. That means your business stays operational.
CoinPayments: Legacy Platform, Outdated Compliance
CoinPayments launched in 2013. Ancient history in crypto years.
Their compliance approach reflects that era.
Regulatory Concerns:
Canadian operational headquarters
Limited US regulatory transparency
No clear state MTL licensing framework
Older KYC/AML protocols
Custody model creates additional regulatory complexity
CoinPayments serves as a custodian for merchant funds. That triggers additional regulatory requirements under US law. Requirements they may not fully meet.
Larecoin's self-custody model eliminates this regulatory burden entirely.

Beyond Compliance: Why Larecoin Wins On Features
Regulatory compliance forms the foundation. But Larecoin delivers additional advantages that save merchants real money.
Fee Structure Comparison
Traditional processors charge 2.9% + $0.30 per transaction. That's the interchange fee killing your margins.
NOWPayments: 0.5% fee (better than traditional, still eating profits)
CoinPayments: 0.5% fee (same problem, different platform)
Larecoin: Gas-only transactions (actual cost under 0.1%)
That's 50% savings compared to competitors. Real savings. Not marketing hype.
NFT Receipt Innovation
Larecoin generates NFT receipts for every transaction. Why does that matter?
Immutable transaction records
Verifiable proof of purchase
Automated accounting reconciliation
Customer engagement opportunities
Resale royalty potential
Neither NOWPayments nor CoinPayments offer comparable receipt innovation. They process payments. Larecoin builds merchant relationships.
LUSD Stablecoin Benefits
Larecoin Dollar (LUSD) provides stable value transactions without volatility risk.
Traditional stablecoins carry regulatory uncertainty. USDT faces banking concerns. USDC deals with centralization issues.
LUSD integrates directly into the Larecoin ecosystem with:
Predictable transaction values
Reduced conversion slippage
Faster settlement times
Lower gas costs
Ecosystem incentives
Want stable transactions? LUSD delivers without third-party dependencies.

Self-Custody Advantage
CoinPayments holds your funds. That creates counterparty risk.
NOWPayments processes through custodial infrastructure. Same problem.
Larecoin enables complete self-custody. You control your keys. You control your funds. Nobody freezes your account. Nobody delays your withdrawals.
Self-custody eliminates:
Platform insolvency risk
Account termination concerns
Withdrawal delays
Custody fee structures
Regulatory seizure vulnerability
Your money. Your control. Always.
The Compliance + Innovation Combination
Most crypto payment processors force a choice.
Compliance OR innovation. Regulation OR features. Safety OR savings.
Larecoin delivers both.
The Framework:
Foundation Layer - US MSB registration + state MTL licensing
Technology Layer - Self-custody + gas-only fees + NFT receipts
Stability Layer - LUSD integration for predictable transactions
Cost Layer - 50% fee reduction vs traditional processors
No other platform combines these elements. NOWPayments offers features without US regulatory clarity. CoinPayments provides custody with outdated compliance. Traditional processors deliver compliance with predatory fees.
Larecoin bridges the gap.

Making The Decision: Which Platform Fits Your Business?
Consider your priorities.
Choose NOWPayments if:
You operate primarily outside the US
European regulatory compliance matters more
You need quick setup without extensive vetting
Choose CoinPayments if:
You prefer custodial payment processing
Legacy platform integration suits your tech stack
Canadian regulatory framework fits your needs
Choose Larecoin if:
US compliance is non-negotiable
Fee savings impact your bottom line
Self-custody aligns with your financial philosophy
NFT receipts add value to your customer experience
Long-term regulatory certainty matters
The choice clarifies quickly.
Get Started With Compliant Web3 Payments
Larecoin builds infrastructure for the next decade of crypto commerce. Not the last cycle's offshore workarounds.
Want to explore the full ecosystem? Check out Larecoin's complete platform and see how Web3 payments work when compliance meets innovation.
Questions about integration? Need technical details? The merchant documentation covers everything from API endpoints to custody architecture.
Compare the alternatives. Review the compliance frameworks. Calculate the fee savings.
Then make the smart choice.
Because in 2026, regulatory compliance isn't optional. It's essential for any merchant building a sustainable crypto payment infrastructure.
Larecoin delivers that foundation: plus fee savings, self-custody, and NFT innovation competitors can't match.

Comments