NOWPayments Alternative Vs Larecoin: Which Is Better For Your Crypto POS System?
- [[[Free!!]<<<<]] Watch: 스포르팅 - 토트넘 Live Stream 13 September 2022
- 2 hours ago
- 4 min read
Looking for a NOWPayments alternative that actually saves you money?
You're in the right place.
The crypto payment processor market is crowded. NOWPayments, CoinPayments, and dozens of others promise easy crypto acceptance. But easy doesn't always mean profitable.
Most merchants don't realize how much those percentage-based fees eat into margins. Especially at scale.
Larecoin takes a different approach. Gas-only pricing. Self-custody. Instant settlement. NFT receipts as proof of purchase.
Let's break down the real differences.
The Fee Problem With Traditional Crypto Processors
NOWPayments charges 0.5% per transaction. CoinPayments takes 0.5-1%. Plus network fees. Plus withdrawal fees.
Sounds reasonable until you do the math.
At $500,000 annual volume:
NOWPayments: $2,500-$5,000 in platform fees
Larecoin: ~$125 in gas fees (Solana network costs)
That's a 95%+ cost reduction.
At $5 million annual volume:
Traditional processors: $25,000-$50,000
Larecoin: ~$1,250
The savings compound exponentially. Every transaction costs $0.00025 on Solana. No percentage cuts. No hidden withdrawal fees.

For high-volume merchants, this difference pays for itself within weeks.
Self-Custody vs Playing Bank With Your Funds
NOWPayments and CoinPayments hold your crypto in custodial wallets. You request withdrawals. They approve them. Sometimes instantly. Sometimes in 24 hours.
You're trusting a third party with your revenue.
Larecoin settles directly to your wallet. Immediately. No intermediaries. No withdrawal requests. No waiting periods.
You control your private keys.
This isn't just philosophical. It's practical risk management.
When FTX collapsed, merchants with funds in custodial processors faced delays. Some lost access entirely. Self-custody eliminates counterparty risk completely.
Your wallet. Your keys. Your funds. Available 24/7.
NFT Receipts: The Proof of Purchase Revolution
Traditional processors send email confirmations. Maybe a transaction ID. That's it.
Larecoin generates blockchain-verified NFT receipts for every transaction.
Why this matters:
Immutable proof of purchase
Transparent transaction history
Customer loyalty program integration
Resale verification for high-value items
Automated warranty tracking
Each NFT receipt contains transaction metadata. Timestamp. Amount. Product details. All permanently recorded on Solana.
For merchants selling collectibles, luxury goods, or limited editions, this creates unprecedented transparency. Customers can verify authenticity instantly.
No forgeries. No disputes. Just verifiable blockchain records.
LUSD: The Missing Stablecoin Advantage
Crypto volatility scares traditional merchants. Understandably.
Accepting Bitcoin payments when BTC swings 10% daily creates accounting nightmares.
Larecoin's LUSD stablecoin solves this. Pegged 1:1 to USD. Built on Solana for instant settlement.
Accept crypto payments without volatility risk.
Customers pay with any supported token. Your POS system converts to LUSD automatically. You receive stable value. Customers use preferred crypto.
NOWPayments offers similar conversions, but charges percentage fees on the conversion. Larecoin's swap function costs only gas.
For restaurants, retail stores, and service businesses, LUSD provides crypto acceptance benefits without treasury management complexity.
Settlement Speed: Sub-Second vs Five Minutes
NOWPayments averages 5-minute confirmation times. Acceptable for online orders. Painful at physical POS terminals.
Larecoin leverages Solana's 400ms block times.
Transactions finalize in under 1 second.
Customer taps phone. Payment confirmed instantly. Receipt generated. Transaction complete.

This speed enables true point-of-sale experiences. No awkward waiting. No "payment pending" screens. Just instant settlement.
For brick-and-mortar merchants, this matches credit card speed without the 2-3% interchange fees.
Feature Showdown: What You Actually Get
Cryptocurrency Support:
NOWPayments: 200-300+ tokens
CoinPayments: 2,000+ tokens
Larecoin: Solana ecosystem tokens with bridge/swap interoperability
Transaction Throughput:
Traditional processors: Limited by Bitcoin/Ethereum speeds
Larecoin: 65,000 transactions per second (Solana capacity)
Integration Complexity:
NOWPayments: API keys, merchant accounts, plugin installations
Larecoin: Connect Solana wallet, generate payment requests
Platform Fees:
Traditional: 0.5-1% per transaction
Larecoin: Zero platform fees (gas only)
Custody Model:
Traditional: Custodial (they hold your funds)
Larecoin: Self-custody (you control keys)
The feature lists tell different stories. NOWPayments prioritizes quantity. Larecoin prioritizes efficiency and cost.
Who Should Choose NOWPayments?
Fair question. NOWPayments serves specific use cases well.
Choose traditional processors if you:
Need extensive fiat off-ramps to local currencies
Require support for 50+ different cryptocurrencies
Want managed services with customer support
Prefer plug-and-play e-commerce platform integrations
Can't manage private keys securely
These processors trade cost efficiency for convenience. For merchants new to crypto or handling small volumes, that trade-off makes sense.
Who Should Choose Larecoin?
Larecoin targets crypto-native businesses and growth-focused merchants.
Choose Larecoin if you:
Process significant transaction volume ($100k+ annually)
Understand wallet management and private keys
Prioritize fee reduction over multi-coin support
Want instant settlement without custodial risk
Value NFT receipt capabilities for customer engagement
Need LUSD stablecoin options for volatility protection
The learning curve is steeper. The cost savings are exponential.
The Real Cost of "Easy"
NOWPayments markets simplicity. Set up in minutes. Accept crypto payments today.
What they don't advertise is the cumulative cost.
Example merchant processing $1 million annually:
Traditional processor at 0.5%: $5,000 in platform fees Plus network fees: ~$2,000 Plus withdrawal fees: ~$1,000 Total: $8,000
Larecoin gas-only model: ~$500 Savings: $7,500 (94% reduction)
That's $7,500 in retained revenue. Per year. Compounding annually.
For businesses operating on thin margins, this difference matters.

Integration Reality Check
"But won't Larecoin take forever to integrate?"
Actually, no.
Larecoin setup:
Create Solana wallet (5 minutes)
Connect wallet to merchant portal
Generate payment QR codes
Start accepting payments
Total time: Under 20 minutes.
NOWPayments requires merchant account verification, API key configuration, and plugin installation. Similar timeframe for experienced users. Longer for beginners.
The complexity myth doesn't hold up.
The Independence Factor
Here's what nobody talks about: processor dependency.
When you use custodial services, you're building on someone else's infrastructure. They change terms. You adapt. They raise fees. You pay.
Larecoin runs on Solana. Decentralized. Permissionless. No company can shut you down.
Merchant independence isn't a buzzword. It's financial sovereignty.
Your business. Your wallet. Your rules.
Making The Decision
Both options work. The question is which aligns with your priorities.
NOWPayments wins on:
Multi-currency breadth
Managed service support
Plug-and-play integrations
Larecoin wins on:
Fee reduction (up to 95%)
Settlement speed (sub-second)
Self-custody control
NFT receipt innovation
Stablecoin payment options
For merchants prioritizing long-term cost efficiency and crypto-native solutions, Larecoin delivers superior economics.
For businesses wanting maximum coin variety with traditional merchant services, NOWPayments remains viable.
Try It Yourself
The best comparison is hands-on testing.
Set up both systems. Process test transactions. Calculate your specific fees.
The numbers don't lie.
Most merchants switching to Larecoin see ROI within the first month. Just from fee savings alone.
Explore Larecoin's merchant solutions and calculate your potential savings.
Your crypto POS system should work for you. Not drain your margins.
Choose accordingly.

Comments