top of page
Search

NOWPayments vs CoinPayments vs Larecoin: Which Crypto POS System Actually Cuts Your Fees by 50%?


Let's cut through the noise.

You're running a business. Every percentage point counts. Traditional merchant fees eat 2-3% of every transaction. You switched to crypto payments to escape that. But guess what? Most crypto POS systems are still charging you percentage-based fees.

That's backwards.

The Real Cost of "Crypto Payment Gateways"

Here's the breakdown you actually need:

NOWPayments:

  • 0.5% for single-currency transactions

  • 1% for multi-currency conversions

  • Plus network fees

  • Plus withdrawal fees

  • Plus currency conversion charges

CoinPayments:

  • 0.5-1% per transaction

  • Plus blockchain fees

  • Plus withdrawal penalties

  • Plus conversion costs

Larecoin:

  • 0% platform fees

  • Pay Solana network gas only

  • That's fractions of a penny per transaction

Crypto POS fee comparison showing NOWPayments and CoinPayments 0.5-1% fees vs Larecoin 0% platform fees

Notice the pattern? Two of these platforms are extracting percentage fees from your revenue. One isn't.

Breaking Down the Math (Because Numbers Don't Lie)

Let's run real scenarios. Not hypothetical "what if" numbers: actual merchant volumes.

$500,000 Annual Processing:

  • NOWPayments/CoinPayments: $2,500-$5,000 in fees

  • Larecoin: Under $2,000

  • Your savings: 50-60%

$1 Million Annual Processing:

  • NOWPayments/CoinPayments: $5,000-$10,000

  • Larecoin: Under $2,000

  • Your savings: 67-83%

$5 Million Annual Processing:

  • NOWPayments/CoinPayments: ~$25,000

  • Larecoin: ~$5,000

  • Your savings: 50-80%

See what happens as you scale? The percentage-based model punishes growth. The gas-only model rewards it.

Why NOWPayments Still Charges Like It's 2018

NOWPayments launched when crypto payments were clunky. Multi-step processes. Custodial wallets. Manual reconciliation.

Their fee structure reflects that legacy architecture:

  • They custody your funds temporarily

  • They handle conversions on their end

  • They manage multiple blockchain integrations

  • They charge for all that middleware

It made sense then. It doesn't now.

Modern Web3 infrastructure eliminated the need for intermediaries. But legacy platforms haven't updated their pricing.

CoinPayments: The Grandfather Problem

CoinPayments has been around since 2013. They support 2,000+ cryptocurrencies.

That sounds impressive until you realize:

  • Most businesses accept 5-10 coins max

  • More integrations = more overhead = higher fees

  • Their tech stack predates modern Layer 1 solutions

  • They're maintaining legacy systems you don't use

You're subsidizing infrastructure you don't need.

Self-custody vs custodial wallet comparison for crypto merchant accounts and payment processing

The Larecoin Difference: Gas-Only Architecture

Here's where it clicks.

Larecoin built on Solana. Not because it's trendy. Because Solana processes 65,000 transactions per second at $0.00025 per transaction.

That's the actual cost of moving value on-chain.

No custodial wallets. No conversion fees. No withdrawal penalties. Just blockchain gas.

What This Means for Merchants:

  • Self-custody merchant accounts (you control your funds)

  • Instant settlement (no 3-day holds)

  • NFT receipts for automatic accounting

  • LUSD stablecoin option for zero volatility

Traditional platforms insert themselves between you and your money. Larecoin removes that extraction layer entirely.

Self-Custody vs. Custodial: The Real Security Question

Let's talk about what happens to your crypto after a sale.

Custodial Model (NOWPayments, CoinPayments):

  1. Customer pays

  2. Funds go to platform's wallet

  3. Platform holds your crypto

  4. You request withdrawal

  5. Platform processes (maybe 24-48 hours)

  6. You pay withdrawal fee

  7. You finally get your money

Self-Custody Model (Larecoin):

  1. Customer pays

  2. Funds hit your wallet immediately

  3. Done

Which would you choose?

NFT Receipts: Accounting That Actually Works

Here's a feature nobody talks about but every merchant needs.

Every Larecoin transaction generates an NFT receipt. Immutable. Timestamped. Automatically organized.

Tax season benefits:

  • No manual reconciliation

  • Blockchain-verified records

  • Instant audit trail

  • Compatible with accounting software

Traditional platforms give you CSV exports. Larecoin gives you programmable receipts.

NFT receipt for crypto transactions showing blockchain-verified accounting and tax records

LUSD: The Stablecoin That Makes Sense

Volatility is the crypto merchant's nightmare. You make a sale at $50,000. Bitcoin drops 5%. You just lost $2,500.

LUSD solves this. It's an algorithmic stablecoin backed by over-collateralization. Not controlled by a centralized entity like USDC. Not algorithmic-only like failed experiments.

Accept payments in:

  • Bitcoin

  • Ethereum

  • LARE (Larecoin's native token)

  • LUSD (instant conversion to stable value)

You choose exposure vs. stability on a per-transaction basis.

Receivables Token: The Feature Nobody Saw Coming

This is where Larecoin gets interesting.

Small businesses struggle with cash flow. You have $100,000 in outstanding invoices. But your suppliers want payment now.

Larecoin's receivables token lets you tokenize those invoices. Sell them at a discount for immediate liquidity. Or use them as collateral in DeFi protocols.

Traditional crypto payment gateways process transactions. Larecoin enables financial instruments.

The Global Reach Advantage

NOWPayments and CoinPayments handle currency conversions. That's their selling point.

But here's what they don't tell you: Every conversion is a fee opportunity. Convert from BTC to EUR? Fee. EUR to USD? Another fee. Withdraw to your bank? Fee again.

Larecoin operates natively in crypto. No fiat conversion unless you choose it. Accept payment in Tokyo. Send payment to Toronto. Zero conversion fees.

Web3 global payments connecting Tokyo and Toronto merchants without currency conversion fees

This is what true Web3 global payments look like.

Who Should Use What Platform?

Use NOWPayments if:

  • You need extensive coin support (100+ cryptocurrencies)

  • You don't process high volume

  • You're okay with custodial arrangements

Use CoinPayments if:

  • You need legacy coin support

  • You're already integrated and can't migrate

  • Fee percentages don't bother you

Use Larecoin if:

  • You process $500k+ annually

  • You want self-custody control

  • You need real accounting tools

  • You care about fees eating your margin

The Bank-Free Business Reality

Traditional finance charges fees because they manage risk. Chargebacks. Fraud. Identity verification.

Crypto eliminates chargebacks. Blockchain verifies identity. Smart contracts manage risk.

So why are you still paying traditional fees?

Making the Switch: Easier Than You Think

Migration anxiety is real. You've got existing systems. Training to consider. Downtime concerns.

Larecoin's merchant portal handles:

  • API integration (compatible with existing POS)

  • Staff training resources

  • Parallel testing (run both systems simultaneously)

  • White-glove onboarding for high-volume merchants

Most businesses are processing Larecoin payments within 72 hours.

The Bottom Line (Literally)

$1 million in annual transactions:

  • Old model: $5,000-$10,000 in fees

  • Larecoin model: Under $2,000

  • Difference: $3,000-$8,000 back in your pocket

That's not marketing speak. That's math.

What Happens Next?

The crypto payments space is consolidating. Percentage-based fee models are dying. Gas-only architecture is taking over.

Early adopters capture the cost advantage. Late movers subsidize legacy systems.

Where do you want to be in 12 months?

Learn more about reducing merchant interchange fees and how Web3 payments are reshaping commerce.

Your fees don't have to stay at 1%. They can drop to fractions of a percent. The technology exists. The infrastructure is live. The choice is yours.

Traditional percentage-based merchant fees vs gas-only crypto payment model cost savings
 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page