top of page
Search

NOWPayments vs Larecoin: Which Crypto POS Actually Slashes Your Interchange Fees?


Interchange fees are killing merchant margins.

You already know that. Credit card networks take 2-3% of every transaction. Crypto payment processors promise relief, but do they deliver?

Let's cut through the marketing noise. We're putting NOWPayments and Larecoin head-to-head to see which platform actually reduces your costs.

The Fee Structure Battle: Percentage vs Gas-Only

NOWPayments follows the traditional playbook:

  • 0.5% for single-currency transactions

  • 1% when you switch currencies mid-transaction

  • Plus network gas fees on top

Larecoin took a different approach:

  • $0.001-$0.02 per transaction (Solana gas fees)

  • Zero platform fees

  • Zero hidden charges

  • No percentage cuts. Ever.

Here's why this matters: percentage-based fees scale with transaction size. Process a $50,000 B2B payment through NOWPayments? You're paying $250-$500 in platform fees alone.

Same transaction on Larecoin? Under two cents.

NOWPayments percentage fees vs Larecoin gas-only pricing comparison for crypto payments

Real Numbers: What You'll Actually Pay

Let's run the math on actual merchant scenarios:

Small Business ($100K annual volume)

  • NOWPayments: $500-$1,000 annually

  • Larecoin: Under $200 annually

  • Savings: 60-80%

Mid-Size Business ($1M annual volume)

  • NOWPayments: $5,000-$10,000 annually

  • Larecoin: Under $2,000 annually

  • Savings: 67-83%

Enterprise ($5M annual volume)

  • NOWPayments: ~$25,000 annually

  • Larecoin: ~$5,000 annually

  • Savings: 50-80%

The larger your volume, the more dramatic the savings. Larecoin's gas-only model doesn't punish growth.

CoinPayments runs similar percentage-based fees. You'll see the same cost scaling problem.

The Self-Custody Advantage Nobody Talks About

NOWPayments holds your funds. They control the keys. You wait for withdrawals.

Their model:

  • Custodial control

  • Withdrawal minimums

  • Settlement delays

  • Counterparty risk

Larecoin's approach:

  • Your keys, your coins

  • Instant access to funds

  • No withdrawal limits

  • Zero counterparty risk

You're not just a customer, you're in control. Your treasury. Your timing. Your decisions.

This isn't philosophical. It's practical. Need to move funds to cover inventory? Done. Want to convert to stables during volatility? Your call. No permissions required.

Merchant cost savings calculator showing annual payment processing fees across business volumes

NFT Receipts: The Feature You Didn't Know You Needed

Traditional payment processors give you a PDF receipt. Maybe a CSV export if you're lucky.

Larecoin mints NFT receipts for every transaction.

Why this matters:

  • Immutable transaction record

  • Built-in dispute resolution

  • Automated accounting integration

  • Tradeable payment history

  • Smart contract-enabled terms

An NFT receipt isn't just a receipt. It's a programmable proof of payment. You can attach warranty terms, loyalty rewards, or future discounts directly to the transaction record.

Your accountant will thank you. Your auditor will be impressed. Your customers get verifiable proof of purchase that lives on-chain forever.

LUSD: Stability Without Banking Dependencies

Stablecoins are the bridge between crypto and commerce. But which stables you accept matters.

Larecoin supports Liquity USD (LUSD), a fully decentralized stablecoin with zero governance and no blacklist function.

LUSD advantages:

  • Purely algorithmic (no centralized issuer)

  • No freeze risk

  • No banking dependencies

  • Immutable code

  • True censorship resistance

Compare this to USDC or USDT, where Circle or Tether can freeze addresses at will. Your business shouldn't depend on a corporation's permission to accept payment.

NOWPayments supports 200+ cryptocurrencies. Great for optionality. Terrible for treasury management. You're juggling dozens of volatile assets, hoping customers pick the right one.

Larecoin's Solana-focused approach with bridge capabilities gives you stability plus choice. Accept LUSD for predictable value. Bridge to other chains when needed. Simple.

Custodial crypto payment control vs self-custody instant access comparison

Compliance: The Unsexy Advantage

Let's talk regulations. Not exciting. Absolutely critical.

Larecoin's compliance strategy:

  • MSB registered (Money Services Business)

  • State MTL licensing strategy in progress

  • Know Your Transaction (KYT) protocols

  • US-focused regulatory approach

  • Proactive compliance framework

You're not just getting a payment processor. You're getting a partner that takes US regulations seriously.

NOWPayments operates globally. That's great for reach. But when US enforcement comes knocking, you want a processor that's already compliant.

The Crypto Clarity Act (H.R. 3633) positions Larecoin for commodity classification. This means clearer rules, reduced enforcement risk, and legitimate business operations.

Settlement Speed: Sub-Second vs 5 Minutes

NOWPayments: ~5 minutes settlement Larecoin: Sub-second finality

Solana processes 65,000+ transactions per second. Your customer pays. You receive confirmation immediately. No waiting. No uncertainty.

This isn't just about speed. It's about customer experience. Fast checkout = happy customers = repeat business.

Try running a high-volume retail operation with 5-minute settlement windows. You'll create bottlenecks. You'll lose sales. You'll frustrate staff.

Sub-second finality solves this. Period.

The Hidden Costs Nobody Mentions

Beyond platform fees, consider:

Integration complexity: NOWPayments requires API integration, webhook configuration, and ongoing maintenance. Larecoin offers plug-and-play merchant portal with minimal technical overhead.

Currency volatility: Accepting 200+ cryptos means constant exposure management. Larecoin's focused ecosystem reduces this complexity.

Customer support: When something breaks at 2am, who answers? Larecoin's community-driven support plus direct team access beats generic ticket systems.

Treasury management: Managing dozens of wallets across multiple chains is expensive. Unified Solana-based treasury is simpler.

NFT receipt with smart contract features including warranty and loyalty rewards integration

What About CoinPayments?

CoinPayments runs 0.5% platform fees plus network costs. Same percentage-based model as NOWPayments.

They've been around longer. More merchant adoption. Better brand recognition.

But you're still paying percentage fees. You're still dealing with custodial control. You're still managing complexity.

Larecoin's gas-only pricing beats both competitors on pure economics.

The Bottom Line: Choose Your Model

Choose NOWPayments if:

  • You need 200+ cryptocurrency options

  • You prefer custodial simplicity

  • You're okay with percentage fees

  • Settlement speed isn't critical

Choose Larecoin if:

  • You want to minimize transaction costs

  • Self-custody matters to your business

  • You value compliance and US market focus

  • You need NFT receipts and programmable payments

  • Sub-second finality improves your operations

  • LUSD's decentralized stability aligns with your treasury strategy

The cryptocurrency payment space is evolving fast. Percentage-based models made sense when platforms needed to cover high operational costs.

Solana changed the economics. Gas fees dropped to fractions of a cent. Larecoin passes those savings directly to merchants.

Ready to Cut Your Payment Costs?

Calculate your current annual payment processing volume. Multiply by 0.5-1%. That's what you're paying competitors.

Now imagine paying under $5,000 annually regardless of volume. That's the Larecoin advantage.

The future of payments isn't percentage-based. It's gas-only. It's self-custody. It's programmable receipts and decentralized stables.

Your competitors are already making the switch. Every day you wait is money left on the table.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page